<b><b>HBF technical director David Baker focuses on the thorny subject of post-construction testing (PCT) as proposed by the new Part E, and argues that the disruption and cost could inhibit the urban regeneration agenda</b></b><br><b>In order to improve sound insulation in new homes, the government would be better off focussing investment in their structure and fabric rather than funding a new control regime - post-construction testing. </b><br><b>PCT is unnecessary within a regulatory framework that is based on approval of drawings and the inspection of work in progress. In reality, minimising the cost and inconvenience of PCT will depend on members being able to agree a sensible regime with building control - it is proposed as an Approved Document solution, rather than a prescriptive requirement. Given the high cost and attendant uncertainty, it is quite likely that the extent of PCT required will be a major determinant in selecting between competing building control service providers.</b><br><b><b>Quotas</b></b><br> The consultation document suggests that a 10% sample should be taken for a typical development. But this will not cover all of the different house and flat types within current typical sites - the total number of properties subject to PCT could be closer to 25%. Additionally, …